Why “Average” Net Worth Numbers Are Misleading (No Matter Your Age)

Headlines about wealth grab attention fast, especially when they tell you what’s “average.” But those numbers rarely tell the full story.

Whether you’re in your 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, or beyond, average net worth figures can make it feel like you’re falling behind, even when you’re doing just fine.

Keep reading; we look at how net worth actually breaks down across age ranges, why averages and medians paint wildly different pictures, and why the gap between them grows as people get older. Along the way, we’ll zoom in on the 50s, a decade where wealth accumulation often accelerates, and where misleading averages can do the most emotional damage.

Table of Contents

1. Numbers to know: $1,369,809 vs. $192,964
2. Average vs. median net worth
3. Why wealth grows slowly and then accelerates
4. Home equity’s role
   1. Alternative assets
5. Why the average can make us feel behind
6. How to think about your financial progress
7. What these numbers actually mean for you

Numbers to know: $1,369,809 vs. $192,964

When people hear a headline net worth figure, they usually hear one number—the average. But averages and medians tell much different stories.

Across age groups, the average net worth is consistently boosted by a relatively small group of ultra-wealthy households. The median, by contrast, shows what’s actually typical. It’s the midpoint where half of households have more and half have less.

That difference exists at every age, but it becomes especially pronounced later in life.

This week, we read several headlines focused on a recent report from financial services company Empower, particularly the finding that the “average” 50-something American has a net worth of almost $1.4 million.

But averages can be misleading.

Average vs. median net worth

You can’t look at the average net worth without also looking at the median. Because both numbers tell two wildly different stories.

The word average does plenty of quiet damage in financial conversations.

• An average is calculated by adding all household net worths and dividing by the total number of households. That means a small group of uber-wealthy families can dramatically skew the result upward.
• The median, on the other hand, represents the middle. It’s often a more realistic benchmark for understanding how most households are actually doing.

While the table above shows that the gap between average and median exists at every age, the 50s stand out. This is often the decade when long-term trends, including homeownership, compounding investments, and peak earnings, finally converge.

Why wealth grows slowly for decades and then accelerates

Wealth accumulation isn’t linear.

For most people, you don’t experience dramatic net worth gains in your 20s, 30s, or even 40s. This is often because you have a smaller income relative to your later years, you may have student loan and credit card debt, and you might be making smaller retirement contributions. Homeownership, if it happens at all, may not come until later in life.

Then, by the time you reach your 50s, several forces begin working together:

• Compounding investment growth finally has time to do its thing
• Earnings peak, so it’s easier to save than in earlier decades
• Debt declines, especially student loans and high-interest debt
• Assets appreciate, if you were fortunate enough to buy a home in earlier years

Together, it can create the appearance of a sudden jump in wealth, when in reality it’s the delayed payoff of you making steady (often mundane) progress.

Home equity may be doing more work than you realize

A large portion of net worth for many Americans isn’t sitting in a brokerage account. It’s tied up in housing.

Homeownership rates increase with age, and many people in their 50s have owned their homes for 10, 20, or even 30 years. Over that time, two things happen simultaneously:

1. Mortgage balances shrink
2. Property values rise

Even modest appreciation, combined with years of principal payments, can translate into hundreds of thousands of dollars in equity. And guess what? Home equity counts toward net worth.

This also explains why net worth comparisons can feel especially discouraging for renters or late buyers. Housing has been one of the biggest wealth accelerators of the past few decades, and access to it has not been evenly distributed.

Alternative assets can affect net worth

Home equity isn’t the only asset that can quietly shape net worth over time. Precious metals like gold and silver can also play a role, especially during periods of market volatility or inflation.

Gold and silver recently hit new all-time highs, which can cause sudden jumps in households’ reported net worth if they already hold these assets. Because metals are typically long-term holdings, their impact often goes unnoticed until prices surge and headlines follow.

That dynamic mirrors what happens with home equity: The value may build slowly over decades and then feel “sudden” when market conditions change. But just like housing, access matters. Not everyone owns gold, and those who do tend to be higher-net-worth households with more diversified portfolios.

It’s also worth noting that precious metals don’t generate income and can be volatile over shorter periods. While some investors use them as a hedge or diversification tool, metals alone rarely account for the wealth gaps reflected in average net worth statistics.

Understanding what assets drive net worth, and who is more likely to own them, helps explain why headline numbers can feel disconnected from everyday financial reality.

Interested in investing in precious metals? Check out our list of the most reputable gold dealers.

Why the average can make us feel behind

If you read that the average 50-something has a net worth of $1.4 million and instantly felt like a failure, you’re not alone.

Averages often imply that something is “the norm.” And when you fall short of that norm, it’s easy to assume you’re the problem. But it’s important to remember that the really wealthy skew the average.

Even if you’re a household that meets or exceeds the average number, you may not feel financial peace like others might assume. Studies consistently show that many high-net-worth individuals still worry about retirement readiness, healthcare costs, and market volatility too.

A better way to think about your own financial progress

Instead of comparing your net worth to an average in a study, it’s more useful to look at your overall trajectory.

For example, questions like these may matter more than a headline number:

• Is my debt moving in the right direction?
• Are my savings and investments growing over time?
• Am I using my income more intentionally than I was a decade ago?
• Do I have an emergency fund that allows me to adapt to setbacks?

Some financial institutions suggest income-based benchmarks (for example, having several multiples of annual income saved by certain ages), but even those are guidelines.

What these numbers actually mean for you

Averages are good to know. The ones we discussed above highlight how powerful time and compounding can be over a long horizon.

But try to refrain from using them for self-comparison. Remember, it doesn’t paint the full picture. Most people in their 50s are not sitting on $1.4 million. Most never were. And many who appear wealthy on paper still feel uncertain about the future.

Understanding the difference between average and median, and focusing on personal momentum instead of public benchmarks can turn a stressful headline into something far more valuable: perspective.

---

Recommended readings